<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest deduction allowed under Section 24(b) for let-out property loans; no addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for minor valuation difference</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90240</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deduction of interest under section 24(b) claimed on loans used for acquiring let-out property, rejecting the revenue&#039;s disallowance as the interest was linked to the rented flat. Regarding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for the difference between agreement and stamp duty values, the tribunal applied a harmonious construction with related provisions and allowed a 10% margin of variance. Since the difference here was within that limit, no addition was warranted. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in entirety, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest deduction and excluding the purported income addition based on marginal valuation difference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=834416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest deduction allowed under Section 24(b) for let-out property loans; no addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for minor valuation difference</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90240</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deduction of interest under section 24(b) claimed on loans used for acquiring let-out property, rejecting the revenue&#039;s disallowance as the interest was linked to the rented flat. Regarding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for the difference between agreement and stamp duty values, the tribunal applied a harmonious construction with related provisions and allowed a 10% margin of variance. Since the difference here was within that limit, no addition was warranted. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in entirety, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest deduction and excluding the purported income addition based on marginal valuation difference.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:36:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>