Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds, affirming the presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legal debt. The accused failed to rebut this presumption, offering no credible explanation or defence evidence under Section 313 CrPC. Mere denial was deemed insufficient. The Court found no error or perversity in the trial court's findings and rejected the revision petition. The compensation of Rs. 15,000 awarded by the trial court was deemed reasonable, and the sentence of imprisonment for default in payment was affirmed. The revision petition was dismissed in its entirety.
The HC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds, affirming the presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legal debt. The accused failed to rebut this presumption, offering no credible explanation or defence evidence under Section 313 CrPC. Mere denial was deemed insufficient. The Court found no error or perversity in the trial court's findings and rejected the revision petition. The compensation of Rs. 15,000 awarded by the trial court was deemed reasonable, and the sentence of imprisonment for default in payment was affirmed. The revision petition was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
