Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds, affirming the presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legal debt. The accused failed to rebut this presumption, offering no credible explanation or defence evidence under Section 313 CrPC. Mere denial was deemed insufficient. The Court found no error or perversity in the trial court's findings and rejected the revision petition. The compensation of Rs. 15,000 awarded by the trial court was deemed reasonable, and the sentence of imprisonment for default in payment was affirmed. The revision petition was dismissed in its entirety.
The HC upheld the conviction for dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds, affirming the presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legal debt. The accused failed to rebut this presumption, offering no credible explanation or defence evidence under Section 313 CrPC. Mere denial was deemed insufficient. The Court found no error or perversity in the trial court's findings and rejected the revision petition. The compensation of Rs. 15,000 awarded by the trial court was deemed reasonable, and the sentence of imprisonment for default in payment was affirmed. The revision petition was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.