Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning attachment and short-payment of Rs.35,59,067. The petitioner admitted liability for the sum and requested monthly installments, but the second respondent failed to consider this representation dated 26.05.2025. The court declined to intervene against garnishee proceedings dated 15.04.2025 given the admitted liability. However, the HC directed the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation for 24 equal monthly installments within three weeks from receipt of the order, recognizing the respondent's duty to consider such applications expeditiously and protect the petitioner's interests.
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning attachment and short-payment of Rs.35,59,067. The petitioner admitted liability for the sum and requested monthly installments, but the second respondent failed to consider this representation dated 26.05.2025. The court declined to intervene against garnishee proceedings dated 15.04.2025 given the admitted liability. However, the HC directed the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation for 24 equal monthly installments within three weeks from receipt of the order, recognizing the respondent's duty to consider such applications expeditiously and protect the petitioner's interests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
