Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interference was warranted against the garnishee proceedings initiated for recovery of the admitted tax dues. (ii) Whether the request for grant of 24 equal monthly instalments for clearing the admitted dues required consideration by the tax authority.
Issue (i): Whether interference was warranted against the garnishee proceedings initiated for recovery of the admitted tax dues.
Analysis: The petitioner admitted liability for the tax amount demanded. In that situation, interference with the recovery proceedings was not considered appropriate.
Conclusion: Relief against the garnishee proceedings was declined.
Issue (ii): Whether the request for grant of 24 equal monthly instalments for clearing the admitted dues required consideration by the tax authority.
Analysis: The representation seeking instalments had not been disposed of, and such a request required prompt consideration by the authority concerned.
Conclusion: The authority was directed to consider and decide the instalment request within three weeks.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by declining interference with recovery, while securing adjudication of the petitioner's request for payment of the admitted dues in instalments.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax liability is admitted, recovery proceedings need not be interdicted, but a pending request for instalment payment should be considered expeditiously by the competent authority.