Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC set aside the respondent's assessment order dated 06.02.2025 for violating principles of natural justice. Although the show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal, the petitioner claimed non-awareness and lack of personal hearing opportunity. The Court held that while portal service is sufficient, the officer should have explored alternative service modes under Section 169 of the GST Act when no response was received, rather than merely fulfilling empty formalities. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration conditioned upon petitioner paying 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. The order's setting aside takes effect from payment date. Petition disposed through remand.
The HC set aside the respondent's assessment order dated 06.02.2025 for violating principles of natural justice. Although the show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal, the petitioner claimed non-awareness and lack of personal hearing opportunity. The Court held that while portal service is sufficient, the officer should have explored alternative service modes under Section 169 of the GST Act when no response was received, rather than merely fulfilling empty formalities. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration conditioned upon petitioner paying 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. The order's setting aside takes effect from payment date. Petition disposed through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
