Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC set aside the respondent's assessment order dated 06.02.2025 for violating principles of natural justice. Although the show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal, the petitioner claimed non-awareness and lack of personal hearing opportunity. The Court held that while portal service is sufficient, the officer should have explored alternative service modes under Section 169 of the GST Act when no response was received, rather than merely fulfilling empty formalities. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration conditioned upon petitioner paying 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. The order's setting aside takes effect from payment date. Petition disposed through remand.
The HC set aside the respondent's assessment order dated 06.02.2025 for violating principles of natural justice. Although the show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal, the petitioner claimed non-awareness and lack of personal hearing opportunity. The Court held that while portal service is sufficient, the officer should have explored alternative service modes under Section 169 of the GST Act when no response was received, rather than merely fulfilling empty formalities. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration conditioned upon petitioner paying 25% of disputed tax amount within four weeks. The order's setting aside takes effect from payment date. Petition disposed through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
