Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the application for condonation of 280 days delay in refiling appeal by power of attorney holder of erstwhile director of corporate debtor. The appellant failed to establish sufficient cause for inordinate delay, offering vague and unsubstantiated explanations regarding unavailability of documents managed by director's father-in-law and health issues. The tribunal found the appellant's conduct casual and lacking diligence in pursuing defect rectification within prescribed seven-day period under Rule 26(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016. Emphasizing that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC is time-bound, the tribunal held such delay undermines expeditious resolution objectives and statutory timelines, warranting dismissal of condonation application.
NCLAT dismissed the application for condonation of 280 days delay in refiling appeal by power of attorney holder of erstwhile director of corporate debtor. The appellant failed to establish sufficient cause for inordinate delay, offering vague and unsubstantiated explanations regarding unavailability of documents managed by director's father-in-law and health issues. The tribunal found the appellant's conduct casual and lacking diligence in pursuing defect rectification within prescribed seven-day period under Rule 26(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016. Emphasizing that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC is time-bound, the tribunal held such delay undermines expeditious resolution objectives and statutory timelines, warranting dismissal of condonation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
