Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that dealer's claim for VAT reimbursement on Raw Petroleum Coke purchases was valid under CST Act Section 15(b). Both Raw and Calcined Petroleum Coke fall within "Coke in all its forms" classification as declared goods. When dealer purchased RPC locally paying VAT, then converted to CPC and sold interstate paying Central Sales Tax, reimbursement entitlement arose. Assessment authority's silence on reimbursement claim did not constitute rejection requiring appeal. Commissioner lacked power to review delegated authority's orders under settled delegation principles. Impugned order dated 19.09.2022 was unauthorized change of opinion following personnel change, constituting impermissible review without statutory authority. Order prejudicial to revenue requires actual revenue loss, not mere procedural error. HC quashed the impugned order and allowed petition, establishing dealer's valid reimbursement claim.
HC held that dealer's claim for VAT reimbursement on Raw Petroleum Coke purchases was valid under CST Act Section 15(b). Both Raw and Calcined Petroleum Coke fall within "Coke in all its forms" classification as declared goods. When dealer purchased RPC locally paying VAT, then converted to CPC and sold interstate paying Central Sales Tax, reimbursement entitlement arose. Assessment authority's silence on reimbursement claim did not constitute rejection requiring appeal. Commissioner lacked power to review delegated authority's orders under settled delegation principles. Impugned order dated 19.09.2022 was unauthorized change of opinion following personnel change, constituting impermissible review without statutory authority. Order prejudicial to revenue requires actual revenue loss, not mere procedural error. HC quashed the impugned order and allowed petition, establishing dealer's valid reimbursement claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.