Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.