Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.