Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s allowance of deduction under Section 80IB. Assessing Officer denied deduction claiming residential units' carpet area exceeded prescribed 60 square meters limit under Section 80IBA without proper verification. AO relied solely on assessee's brochures and failed to refer matter to District Valuation Officer for measurement verification as required. Revenue provided no material evidence proving floor area exceeded statutory limit. CIT(A) properly verified records, sale deeds, and floor plans before allowing deduction. Local Authority's Building Use Certificate confirmed compliance with RERA Act Section 2(k) definition showing units under 60 square meters. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision due to Revenue's failure to substantiate disallowance with proper evidence or DVO report.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s allowance of deduction under Section 80IB. Assessing Officer denied deduction claiming residential units' carpet area exceeded prescribed 60 square meters limit under Section 80IBA without proper verification. AO relied solely on assessee's brochures and failed to refer matter to District Valuation Officer for measurement verification as required. Revenue provided no material evidence proving floor area exceeded statutory limit. CIT(A) properly verified records, sale deeds, and floor plans before allowing deduction. Local Authority's Building Use Certificate confirmed compliance with RERA Act Section 2(k) definition showing units under 60 square meters. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision due to Revenue's failure to substantiate disallowance with proper evidence or DVO report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
