Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s allowance of deduction under Section 80IB. Assessing Officer denied deduction claiming residential units' carpet area exceeded prescribed 60 square meters limit under Section 80IBA without proper verification. AO relied solely on assessee's brochures and failed to refer matter to District Valuation Officer for measurement verification as required. Revenue provided no material evidence proving floor area exceeded statutory limit. CIT(A) properly verified records, sale deeds, and floor plans before allowing deduction. Local Authority's Building Use Certificate confirmed compliance with RERA Act Section 2(k) definition showing units under 60 square meters. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision due to Revenue's failure to substantiate disallowance with proper evidence or DVO report.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
