Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT partially allowed appellant's challenge to adjudicating authority's rejection of financial creditor applications. The Resolution Professional (RP) acknowledged payments received from appellants toward club suites but claimed inability to verify appellant's status as financial creditor due to forged documents from other claimants. RP later raised new defense of unit cancellation/surrender not previously presented to adjudicating authority. NCLAT found adjudicating authority failed to consider each application individually on merits, instead rejecting all applications solely based on decision in unrelated I.A. No.5177/2022 without establishing factual similarity. Court held individual consideration required given distinct facts of each case and RP's acknowledgment of payments. Order dated 21.11.2023 set aside regarding I.A. Nos. 1377/2023, 1375/2023, 1376/2023 & 1385/2023, remanding applications for fresh consideration by adjudicating authority.
NCLAT partially allowed appellant's challenge to adjudicating authority's rejection of financial creditor applications. The Resolution Professional (RP) acknowledged payments received from appellants toward club suites but claimed inability to verify appellant's status as financial creditor due to forged documents from other claimants. RP later raised new defense of unit cancellation/surrender not previously presented to adjudicating authority. NCLAT found adjudicating authority failed to consider each application individually on merits, instead rejecting all applications solely based on decision in unrelated I.A. No.5177/2022 without establishing factual similarity. Court held individual consideration required given distinct facts of each case and RP's acknowledgment of payments. Order dated 21.11.2023 set aside regarding I.A. Nos. 1377/2023, 1375/2023, 1376/2023 & 1385/2023, remanding applications for fresh consideration by adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
