Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC allowed revision petition in money laundering case where petitioner was not arrested during ED investigation under Section 19 PMLA but summoned by Special Court. Despite filing bail application and separate petition for release under Section 91 BNSS, Special Court rejected bail applying rigorous Section 45(1) PMLA provisions while ignoring Section 91 application. HC held that when ED chose not to arrest accused during investigation despite serious allegations, Special Court erred in applying PMLA bail restrictions instead of mandatory release under Section 91 BNSS upon bond execution as mandated by Supreme Court precedent in Tarsem Lal. Court distinguished case from situations involving non-bailable warrants for evasive accused, concluding petitioner entitled to immediate release on bond under BNSS provisions regardless of allegation gravity.
HC allowed revision petition in money laundering case where petitioner was not arrested during ED investigation under Section 19 PMLA but summoned by Special Court. Despite filing bail application and separate petition for release under Section 91 BNSS, Special Court rejected bail applying rigorous Section 45(1) PMLA provisions while ignoring Section 91 application. HC held that when ED chose not to arrest accused during investigation despite serious allegations, Special Court erred in applying PMLA bail restrictions instead of mandatory release under Section 91 BNSS upon bond execution as mandated by Supreme Court precedent in Tarsem Lal. Court distinguished case from situations involving non-bailable warrants for evasive accused, concluding petitioner entitled to immediate release on bond under BNSS provisions regardless of allegation gravity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
