Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner's Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.
HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner's Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
