<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner ineligible for declaration under Section 125(1) Sabka Vishwas Scheme despite authority accepting Form SVLDRS-1</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89844</link>
    <description>HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner&#039;s Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner ineligible for declaration under Section 125(1) Sabka Vishwas Scheme despite authority accepting Form SVLDRS-1</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89844</link>
      <description>HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner&#039;s Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>