Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner's Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.
HC held petitioner was not entitled to file declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 under Section 125(1) of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Designated Authority erroneously accepted petitioner's Form SVLDRS-1 filed on 30.12.2019 and issued Form SVLDRS-3 on 07.01.2020, as no scope existed for entertaining application under Section 125(1)(f). Court ruled that mere issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 did not ipso facto entitle petitioner to settlement under the Scheme. Since declaration was unavailable to petitioner, discharge certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 could not be issued. HC directed respondents to proceed with Show Cause Notice adjudication on merits according to law and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.