Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT's order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee's claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT's order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee's claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
