Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of Rs. 6...
Assessee's Rs. 6 crore addition deleted under sections 68, 69, and 115BBE after proving cash reference was typographical error for 2013 loan transaction.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of Rs. 6 crore addition under sections 68 and 69 read with section 115BBE. Assessee-firm executed exchange agreement mentioning cash consideration for property purchase, but tribunal found this was typographical error referring to loan previously given by cheque in 2013. Property was already attached under section 281B making subsequent transactions void ab initio. Document analysis revealed assessee created mortgage charge to secure capital against attached property, with borrower given three months to resolve departmental disputes. Tribunal held cash payment reference was same loan amount from 2013, not separate unexplained cash credit. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld as Assessing Officer erred in treating mortgage transaction as distinct cash purchase.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of Rs. 6 crore addition under sections 68 and 69 read with section 115BBE. Assessee-firm executed exchange agreement mentioning cash consideration for property purchase, but tribunal found this was typographical error referring to loan previously given by cheque in 2013. Property was already attached under section 281B making subsequent transactions void ab initio. Document analysis revealed assessee created mortgage charge to secure capital against attached property, with borrower given three months to resolve departmental disputes. Tribunal held cash payment reference was same loan amount from 2013, not separate unexplained cash credit. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld as Assessing Officer erred in treating mortgage transaction as distinct cash purchase.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.