ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of Rs. 6...
Assessee's Rs. 6 crore addition deleted under sections 68, 69, and 115BBE after proving cash reference was typographical error for 2013 loan transaction.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of Rs. 6 crore addition under sections 68 and 69 read with section 115BBE. Assessee-firm executed exchange agreement mentioning cash consideration for property purchase, but tribunal found this was typographical error referring to loan previously given by cheque in 2013. Property was already attached under section 281B making subsequent transactions void ab initio. Document analysis revealed assessee created mortgage charge to secure capital against attached property, with borrower given three months to resolve departmental disputes. Tribunal held cash payment reference was same loan amount from 2013, not separate unexplained cash credit. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld as Assessing Officer erred in treating mortgage transaction as distinct cash purchase.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.