Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT upheld addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68, rejecting assessee's discharge of onus regarding investor identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness. Tribunal found entire share application money received in cash without proper transaction dates filed before authorities constituted self-serving evidence. Director's non-appearance for examination despite partial statement recording, combined with ongoing company irregularity proceedings, established transactions as make-believe scheme lacking genuineness. ITAT distinguished criminal proceedings requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt from assessment proceedings governed by preponderance of probabilities, human probabilities test, and surrounding circumstances standard. Despite pending SIT verdict potentially providing criminal relief, Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s order applying lower civil standard of proof appropriate for income tax assessments, dismissing assessee's grounds and sustaining Section 68 addition.
ITAT upheld addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68, rejecting assessee's discharge of onus regarding investor identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness. Tribunal found entire share application money received in cash without proper transaction dates filed before authorities constituted self-serving evidence. Director's non-appearance for examination despite partial statement recording, combined with ongoing company irregularity proceedings, established transactions as make-believe scheme lacking genuineness. ITAT distinguished criminal proceedings requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt from assessment proceedings governed by preponderance of probabilities, human probabilities test, and surrounding circumstances standard. Despite pending SIT verdict potentially providing criminal relief, Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s order applying lower civil standard of proof appropriate for income tax assessments, dismissing assessee's grounds and sustaining Section 68 addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.