<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Share application money addition upheld under Section 68 due to unproven investor identity and transaction genuineness</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89608</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68, rejecting assessee&#039;s discharge of onus regarding investor identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness. Tribunal found entire share application money received in cash without proper transaction dates filed before authorities constituted self-serving evidence. Director&#039;s non-appearance for examination despite partial statement recording, combined with ongoing company irregularity proceedings, established transactions as make-believe scheme lacking genuineness. ITAT distinguished criminal proceedings requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt from assessment proceedings governed by preponderance of probabilities, human probabilities test, and surrounding cir.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Share application money addition upheld under Section 68 due to unproven investor identity and transaction genuineness</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89608</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68, rejecting assessee&#039;s discharge of onus regarding investor identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness. Tribunal found entire share application money received in cash without proper transaction dates filed before authorities constituted self-serving evidence. Director&#039;s non-appearance for examination despite partial statement recording, combined with ongoing company irregularity proceedings, established transactions as make-believe scheme lacking genuineness. ITAT distinguished criminal proceedings requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt from assessment proceedings governed by preponderance of probabilities, human probabilities test, and surrounding cir.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:35:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>