Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appellant's challenge to property attachment under PMLA, confirming the Adjudicating Authority's decision. The appellant paid Rs. 14,79,816 of Rs. 29,79,816 property consideration through installments during the predicate offence period, constituting proceeds of crime. The total allegation of Rs. 16,99,000 approximately equals the appellant's part payment, establishing nexus between property acquisition and criminal proceeds. The tribunal found no valid grounds for appeal and determined premature release inappropriate with pending scheduled offence trial. While dismissing the appeal as meritless, the AT directed ED to refrain from coercive possession or confiscation steps until criminal trial finalization, except under exceptional circumstances.
The AT dismissed the appellant's challenge to property attachment under PMLA, confirming the Adjudicating Authority's decision. The appellant paid Rs. 14,79,816 of Rs. 29,79,816 property consideration through installments during the predicate offence period, constituting proceeds of crime. The total allegation of Rs. 16,99,000 approximately equals the appellant's part payment, establishing nexus between property acquisition and criminal proceeds. The tribunal found no valid grounds for appeal and determined premature release inappropriate with pending scheduled offence trial. While dismissing the appeal as meritless, the AT directed ED to refrain from coercive possession or confiscation steps until criminal trial finalization, except under exceptional circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
