Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Appellant's property attachment upheld under PMLA as payments during crime period establish proceeds nexus

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The AT dismissed the appellant's challenge to property attachment under PMLA, confirming the Adjudicating Authority's decision. The appellant paid Rs. 14,79,816 of Rs. 29,79,816 property consideration through installments during the predicate offence period, constituting proceeds of crime. The total allegation of Rs. 16,99,000 approximately equals the appellant's part payment, establishing nexus between property acquisition and criminal proceeds. The tribunal found no valid grounds for appeal and determined premature release inappropriate with pending scheduled offence trial. While dismissing the appeal as meritless, the AT directed ED to refrain from coercive possession or confiscation steps until criminal trial finalization, except under exceptional circumstances.....