Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order dated 30.09.2019, directing refund of excess CENVAT credit of Rs.12,86,186/-. The tribunal held that Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 provides transitional arrangements enabling cash refund of unutilized CENVAT credit when transitioning from service tax regime to GST. The lower authority erroneously rejected the refund application on grounds that no provision existed for cash refund of CENVAT credit. CESTAT ruled that Section 142 contains non-obstante clause with overriding effect over Central Excise Act provisions, except Section 11B(2) relating to unjust enrichment. Since Central Excise Act was repealed and CENVAT Credit Rules superseded during GST implementation, Section 142 adequately provides legal framework for sanctioning cash refunds of excess transitional credits.
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order dated 30.09.2019, directing refund of excess CENVAT credit of Rs.12,86,186/-. The tribunal held that Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 provides transitional arrangements enabling cash refund of unutilized CENVAT credit when transitioning from service tax regime to GST. The lower authority erroneously rejected the refund application on grounds that no provision existed for cash refund of CENVAT credit. CESTAT ruled that Section 142 contains non-obstante clause with overriding effect over Central Excise Act provisions, except Section 11B(2) relating to unjust enrichment. Since Central Excise Act was repealed and CENVAT Credit Rules superseded during GST implementation, Section 142 adequately provides legal framework for sanctioning cash refunds of excess transitional credits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.