Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld partial addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained creditor under Section 68, while dismissing Revenue's challenge to remaining loan transactions. The tribunal found the assessee successfully established three key ingredients: identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions from the lender. Despite absence of ITR, the tribunal accepted the loan's source and routing, relying on documentary evidence including account confirmations and bank records. Consistent with precedential rulings, the tribunal concluded no unaccounted income was demonstrated, thereby partially allowing the assessee's appeal and confirming only a limited portion of the disputed amount.
ITAT upheld partial addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained creditor under Section 68, while dismissing Revenue's challenge to remaining loan transactions. The tribunal found the assessee successfully established three key ingredients: identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions from the lender. Despite absence of ITR, the tribunal accepted the loan's source and routing, relying on documentary evidence including account confirmations and bank records. Consistent with precedential rulings, the tribunal concluded no unaccounted income was demonstrated, thereby partially allowing the assessee's appeal and confirming only a limited portion of the disputed amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.