<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Wins Partial Victory: Section 68 Challenge Upheld with Credible Loan Transaction Evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89527</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld partial addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained creditor under Section 68, while dismissing Revenue&#039;s challenge to remaining loan transactions. The tribunal found the assessee successfully established three key ingredients: identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions from the lender. Despite absence of ITR, the tribunal accepted the loan&#039;s source and routing, relying on documentary evidence including account confirmations and bank records. Consistent with precedential rulings, the tribunal concluded no unaccounted income was demonstrated, thereby partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and confirming only a limited portion of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Wins Partial Victory: Section 68 Challenge Upheld with Credible Loan Transaction Evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89527</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld partial addition of Rs. 2,25,000 as unexplained creditor under Section 68, while dismissing Revenue&#039;s challenge to remaining loan transactions. The tribunal found the assessee successfully established three key ingredients: identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions from the lender. Despite absence of ITR, the tribunal accepted the loan&#039;s source and routing, relying on documentary evidence including account confirmations and bank records. Consistent with precedential rulings, the tribunal concluded no unaccounted income was demonstrated, thereby partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and confirming only a limited portion of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>