Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
AT dismissed the appeal in money laundering case involving demonetized currency exchange. Despite no ongoing trial or charge sheet against the appellant, the Enforcement Directorate's Property Attachment Order (PAO) was upheld. The tribunal found substantial evidence of conspiracy and collusion with bank officials. Applying the second limb of "proceeds of crime" definition, the tribunal attached property of equivalent value. The appellant's arguments were rejected, with the tribunal noting the absence of closure report and clear indication of the appellant's role in the predicate offence. Appeal was conclusively dismissed as meritless.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.