Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning CENVAT credit refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. The tribunal found that the appellant had correctly followed prescribed procedures for input credit and periodic returns for June 2017. The decision recognized the transitional provisions from the old tax regime to GST, holding that existing Central Excise Act conditions would apply except for the unjust enrichment clause. The tribunal determined that the legal framework sufficiently supports cash refund of excess CENVAT credit during the GST transition, thereby invalidating the lower appellate authority's order rejecting the refund claim.
CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning CENVAT credit refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. The tribunal found that the appellant had correctly followed prescribed procedures for input credit and periodic returns for June 2017. The decision recognized the transitional provisions from the old tax regime to GST, holding that existing Central Excise Act conditions would apply except for the unjust enrichment clause. The tribunal determined that the legal framework sufficiently supports cash refund of excess CENVAT credit during the GST transition, thereby invalidating the lower appellate authority's order rejecting the refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
