Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
