Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the tender condition requiring payment of 18% GST on the auction of human hair could be sustained when the Central Government notification and the HR&CE circular indicated that no GST was payable on such collection.
Analysis: The auction related to collection of human hair, and the material placed before the Court showed that the relevant Central Government notification granted exemption from GST for human hair, unworked whether or not washed, including waste of human hair. The HR&CE circular also stated that no GST was payable for auctions pertaining to collection of human hair. In that backdrop, insisting on 18% GST through clause 23 of the tender condition was inconsistent with the applicable exemption position.
Conclusion: Clause 23 of the tender notification, insofar as it mandated payment of 18% GST, was interfered with, and the participants in the auction were held not liable to be insisted upon to pay such GST.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of the GST condition in the tender, and the impugned clause was set aside in effect.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tender condition imposes GST contrary to an applicable exemption for the subject goods or activity, the condition cannot be enforced.