Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
