Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
HC adjudicated a challenge to a tender notification's GST condition. The petitioner contested the mandatory 18% GST requirement for auction participants of human hair. The HC determined that based on central government notifications and departmental circulars, human hair collection does not attract GST. Consequently, the court modified clause 23 of the tender notification, prohibiting the respondent from mandating 18% GST from auction participants. The writ petition was disposed of, effectively invalidating the GST imposition and providing relief to potential tender participants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
