Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
CESTAT allowed appellant's request for re-sampling and re-testing of goods, referencing Tata Chemicals Ltd. precedent. The tribunal determined that re-testing could be conducted within the stipulated period, emphasizing adherence to prescribed sampling methodology. The decision mandates sample re-drawing under proper panchnama and retesting at CRCL, Vadodara, following applicable IS standard procedures. The ruling prioritizes procedural compliance and ensures comprehensive goods verification, ultimately serving departmental interests and maintaining judicial fairness in goods assessment.