Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The AAR ruled that the Tie-in pipeline, which transfers re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National Grid, does not qualify as "plant and machinery" under Section 17 of the CGST Act. Despite using various technical systems and devices, the pipeline remains a structure laid outside factory premises. Consequently, the applicant is precluded from claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) for GST paid on goods and services used in constructing the pipeline, as per Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017, as amended by the Finance Act 2025.
The AAR ruled that the Tie-in pipeline, which transfers re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National Grid, does not qualify as "plant and machinery" under Section 17 of the CGST Act. Despite using various technical systems and devices, the pipeline remains a structure laid outside factory premises. Consequently, the applicant is precluded from claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) for GST paid on goods and services used in constructing the pipeline, as per Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017, as amended by the Finance Act 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.