Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The AAR ruled that the Tie-in pipeline, which transfers re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National Grid, does not qualify as "plant and machinery" under Section 17 of the CGST Act. Despite using various technical systems and devices, the pipeline remains a structure laid outside factory premises. Consequently, the applicant is precluded from claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) for GST paid on goods and services used in constructing the pipeline, as per Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017, as amended by the Finance Act 2025.
The AAR ruled that the Tie-in pipeline, which transfers re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National Grid, does not qualify as "plant and machinery" under Section 17 of the CGST Act. Despite using various technical systems and devices, the pipeline remains a structure laid outside factory premises. Consequently, the applicant is precluded from claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) for GST paid on goods and services used in constructing the pipeline, as per Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017, as amended by the Finance Act 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.