Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a Section 7 IBC application, finding the petition within limitation period. The Tribunal held that consistent debt acknowledgment in balance sheets from FY 2015-16 to 2022-23 extended the limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act. Despite initial default on 31.03.2016, the Financial Creditor's evidence demonstrated continuing liability, with specific creditor details appearing in 2022-23 balance sheet. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding improper NPA classification, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's findings that the debt was validly acknowledged and the application was not time-barred. Appeals were consequently dismissed as lacking merit.
NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a Section 7 IBC application, finding the petition within limitation period. The Tribunal held that consistent debt acknowledgment in balance sheets from FY 2015-16 to 2022-23 extended the limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act. Despite initial default on 31.03.2016, the Financial Creditor's evidence demonstrated continuing liability, with specific creditor details appearing in 2022-23 balance sheet. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding improper NPA classification, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's findings that the debt was validly acknowledged and the application was not time-barred. Appeals were consequently dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
