<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Debt Acknowledgment in Balance Sheets Validates IBC Application Under Section 18 Limitation Act Provisions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89320</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a Section 7 IBC application, finding the petition within limitation period. The Tribunal held that consistent debt acknowledgment in balance sheets from FY 2015-16 to 2022-23 extended the limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act. Despite initial default on 31.03.2016, the Financial Creditor&#039;s evidence demonstrated continuing liability, with specific creditor details appearing in 2022-23 balance sheet. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding improper NPA classification, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings that the debt was validly acknowledged and the application was not time-barred. Appeals were consequently dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Debt Acknowledgment in Balance Sheets Validates IBC Application Under Section 18 Limitation Act Provisions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89320</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a Section 7 IBC application, finding the petition within limitation period. The Tribunal held that consistent debt acknowledgment in balance sheets from FY 2015-16 to 2022-23 extended the limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act. Despite initial default on 31.03.2016, the Financial Creditor&#039;s evidence demonstrated continuing liability, with specific creditor details appearing in 2022-23 balance sheet. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding improper NPA classification, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings that the debt was validly acknowledged and the application was not time-barred. Appeals were consequently dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>