PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
ITAT adjudicated two primary issues: IPO expenditure and excise duty subsidy classification. On IPO expenditure, the tribunal allowed 92% as revenue expenditure under section 35D, permitting capital portion of share issue expenses. Regarding excise duty subsidy, the tribunal determined the receipt as capital in nature, not taxable, based on legislative intent and judicial precedents. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention, holding that absence of explicit "exemption" terminology in Section 2(24)(xviii) precludes treating the subsidy as revenue receipt. Consequently, the excise duty exemption was classified as capital receipt for Assessment Year 2016-17, not chargeable to tax, and excluded from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation under Section 115JB.
ITAT adjudicated two primary issues: IPO expenditure and excise duty subsidy classification. On IPO expenditure, the tribunal allowed 92% as revenue expenditure under section 35D, permitting capital portion of share issue expenses. Regarding excise duty subsidy, the tribunal determined the receipt as capital in nature, not taxable, based on legislative intent and judicial precedents. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention, holding that absence of explicit "exemption" terminology in Section 2(24)(xviii) precludes treating the subsidy as revenue receipt. Consequently, the excise duty exemption was classified as capital receipt for Assessment Year 2016-17, not chargeable to tax, and excluded from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation under Section 115JB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
