Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of 100-day delay in filing an appeal against SEBI's confirmatory order. The tribunal found the appellant's grounds-including travel for social purposes, medical appointments, and advocate changes-insufficient to justify the delay. As a Non-Executive Director and Chairman, the appellant was deemed negligent in not timely pursuing the appeal. The tribunal applied established legal principles and exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to reject the delay condonation request, thereby effectively maintaining the original order.
AT dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of 100-day delay in filing an appeal against SEBI's confirmatory order. The tribunal found the appellant's grounds-including travel for social purposes, medical appointments, and advocate changes-insufficient to justify the delay. As a Non-Executive Director and Chairman, the appellant was deemed negligent in not timely pursuing the appeal. The tribunal applied established legal principles and exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to reject the delay condonation request, thereby effectively maintaining the original order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.