Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
AT dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of 100-day delay in filing an appeal against SEBI's confirmatory order. The tribunal found the appellant's grounds-including travel for social purposes, medical appointments, and advocate changes-insufficient to justify the delay. As a Non-Executive Director and Chairman, the appellant was deemed negligent in not timely pursuing the appeal. The tribunal applied established legal principles and exercised its discretionary jurisdiction to reject the delay condonation request, thereby effectively maintaining the original order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.