Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was impermissible where the taxpayer had fully disclosed all material facts during original assessment proceedings. The AO's attempt to reopen after four years, based on mere change of opinion without tangible evidence of escaped income, was deemed invalid. The court found that purchase deeds for immovable property investments were already submitted during initial assessment, rendering the subsequent reassessment notice unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned notice was quashed, effectively protecting the assessee's original assessment and preventing arbitrary tax reassessment beyond statutory limitations.
HC held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was impermissible where the taxpayer had fully disclosed all material facts during original assessment proceedings. The AO's attempt to reopen after four years, based on mere change of opinion without tangible evidence of escaped income, was deemed invalid. The court found that purchase deeds for immovable property investments were already submitted during initial assessment, rendering the subsequent reassessment notice unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned notice was quashed, effectively protecting the assessee's original assessment and preventing arbitrary tax reassessment beyond statutory limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
