Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.