Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC granted regular bail in a narcotic smuggling case, finding procedural violations under NDPS Act. The court determined that the applicant was held in illegal custody from 21.05.2023 to 25.05.2023, violating constitutional rights under Articles 21 and 22. Despite Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions, bail was granted due to significant procedural non-compliance, including delayed reporting, non-production within 24 hours, and absence of prior information documentation. The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a matching surety, subject to trial court conditions. Bail application was allowed, recognizing fundamental rights and procedural irregularities in the detention process.
HC granted regular bail in a narcotic smuggling case, finding procedural violations under NDPS Act. The court determined that the applicant was held in illegal custody from 21.05.2023 to 25.05.2023, violating constitutional rights under Articles 21 and 22. Despite Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions, bail was granted due to significant procedural non-compliance, including delayed reporting, non-production within 24 hours, and absence of prior information documentation. The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a matching surety, subject to trial court conditions. Bail application was allowed, recognizing fundamental rights and procedural irregularities in the detention process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.