Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
AT determined that the predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, despite initial jurisdictional complexities involving Karnataka and Chhattisgarh State Police. The court found substantive evidence of potential criminal activities under Sections 384 and 420 IPC, along with offences under Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the appellant's arguments lacked merit, resulting in appeal dismissal, thereby upholding the original findings related to potential money laundering proceedings under PMLA 2002.
AT determined that the predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, despite initial jurisdictional complexities involving Karnataka and Chhattisgarh State Police. The court found substantive evidence of potential criminal activities under Sections 384 and 420 IPC, along with offences under Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the appellant's arguments lacked merit, resulting in appeal dismissal, thereby upholding the original findings related to potential money laundering proceedings under PMLA 2002.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.