https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89050 AT determined that the predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, despite initial jurisdictional complexities involving Karnataka and Chhattisgarh State Police. The court found substantive evidence of potential criminal activities under Sections 384 and 420 IPC, along with offences under Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the appellant's arguments lacked merit, resulting in appeal dismissal, thereby upholding the original findings related to potential money laundering proceedings under PMLA 2002. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89050 AT determined that the predicate offence existed at the time of ECIR recording, despite initial jurisdictional complexities involving Karnataka and Chhattisgarh State Police. The court found substantive evidence of potential criminal activities under Sections 384 and 420 IPC, along with offences under Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the appellant's arguments lacked merit, resulting in appeal dismissal, thereby upholding the original findings related to potential money laundering proceedings under PMLA 2002. Highlights Money Laundering Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89050