Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.