Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked in the first show cause notice. The service tax demand on amounts received from foreign counterparts under reverse charge mechanism is upheld within the normal limitation period. The appellant's incorrect understanding of tax law was deemed a reasonable cause. All penalties were set aside under section 80. The appeal was partially allowed, with the matter remanded to the Commissioner for calculating and appropriating tax and interest payments already made.
CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked in the first show cause notice. The service tax demand on amounts received from foreign counterparts under reverse charge mechanism is upheld within the normal limitation period. The appellant's incorrect understanding of tax law was deemed a reasonable cause. All penalties were set aside under section 80. The appeal was partially allowed, with the matter remanded to the Commissioner for calculating and appropriating tax and interest payments already made.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.