Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.